SLR Global Performance Report Card

April 1, 2002 through March 31, 2003

In addition to the report card are the following graphs. Performance Graphs are in .pdf and .ppt. Note: Click on the hyperlinks below to go the appropriate graph. Please don't forget to change your printer page format to landscape if you want to print the charts.

The performance report card is divided into two tables for readability. Table 1 contains performance parameters based on data volume, on-site processing statistics and operational compliance issues. Table 2 contains performance parameters based on CSR and MCC orbital analysis results.

Below are the detailed descriptions of each column in Table 1:

  • Column 1 is the station location name.
  • Column 2 is the monument marker number.
  • Column 3 is the LEO pass total during the past 12 months.
  • Column 4 is the LAGEOS pass total during the past 12 months.
  • Column 5 is the high satellite pass total during the past 12 months.
  • Column 6 is the pass total (i.e., all satellites) during the past 12 months.
  • Column 7 is the LEO NP total during the past 12 months.
  • Column 8 is the LAGEOS NP total during the past 12 months.
  • Column 9 is the high satellite NP total during the past 12 months.
  • Column 10 is the NP total (i.e., all satellites) during the past 12 months.
  • Column 11 is the tracking minutes total (i.e., all satellites) during the past 12 months. This is computed by the summation of the number of normal points multiplied by its bin size in minutes.
  • Column 12 is the average single-shot calibration RMS, in millimeters, during the last quarter.
  • Column 13 is the average single-shot ERS RMS, in millimeters, during the last quarter.
  • Column 14 is the average single-shot LAGEOS RMS, in millimeters, during the last quarter.
  • Column 15 is the median data latency, in hours, to the data centers, during the last quarter.
  • Column 16 is the ILRS normal point format revision number used within the last quarter.
  • Column 17 is a yes/no answer to the question of whether or not a site log has been provided to the central bureau. Site logs will be a replacement for the configuration files.

The first entry in each table is for the performance baseline goal. Note: There are no baseline goals for NP data quantities, single shot RMS's.

Additional Notes: Blanks in any columns implies either that there was no data or that there was insufficient data. Only stations that have supplied data within the last year are included in the table. The table is sorted in descending order by total passes.

Table 1

Site Information Data Volume
Data Quality
Operational Compliance
Column 1 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15 16 17
Location Station Number
LEO Totals
LAGEOS Tot
High Tot
Total passes
LEO NP Total
LAGEOS NP Total
High NP Total
Total NP
Minutes of Track
Cal. RMS
ERS RMS
LAG RMS
Data Latency (hours) Format Revision Site logs
Baseline
1000
400
100
1500
12
1
yes
Yarragadee 7090 6886 1150 788 8824 126978 12959 6512 146449 96011 4.2 7.9 9.4 2 1 yes
Monument Peak 7110 6738 1132 483 8353 117601 11658 3601 132860 77435 5.3 8.3 8.2 2 1 yes
Graz 7839 5324 827 398 6549 103679 10636 3691 118006 69835 3.6 3.3 8.6 1 1 yes
Herstmonceux 7840 4760 1081 504 6345 65921 13696 2504 82121 59779 7.8 10.0 16.0 1 1 yes
Greenbelt 7105 5285 670 177 6132 93794 6794 1214 101802 48750 4.9 7.0 9.2 2 1 yes
Changchun 7237 3492 725 392 4609 53204 7318 3093 63615 46683 12.7 13.9 15.4 1 1 yes
Riyadh 7832 2921 871 364 4156 42351 9372 2467 54190 45148 8.9 10.6 15.6 5 0 yes
Zimmerwald 7810 3050 718 242 4010 46302 9801 1780 57883 43264 15.7 16.1 19.5 1 1 yes
Hartebeesthoek 7501 2849 771 270 3890 40296 9079 2614 51989 44739 5.0 7.0 9.2 3 1 yes
Haleakala 7210 2719 607 300 3626 39984 5623 2137 47744 34051 4.8 8.4 9.3 1 1 yes
McDonald 7080 2290 658 431 3379 27340 5496 1649 34485 27861 11.0 12.3 11.7 1 1 yes
Mt. Stromlo 7849 2369 614 205 3188 25791 4920 1303 32014 25676 4.2 5.8 10.8 1 1 yes
Wettzell 8834 2125 593 188 2906 28891 5304 908 35103 25182 3.1/12.7 14.4 19.2/22.7 1 1 yes
San Fernando 7824 2279 404 0 2683 31716 2529 0 34245 14794 7.1 13.4 15.0 0 1 yes
Grasse 7835 2037 287 2 2326 41722 3267 20 45009 18147 5.3 8.9 16.8 1 1 yes
Simosato 7838 1652 247 61 1960 31703 2218 427 34348 16514 17.9 23.6 27.7 1 0 yes
Arequipa 7403 1742 143 0 1885 24147 1306 0 25453 10375 6.2 7.3 8.1 1 1 yes
Potsdam 7836 1532 230 27 1789 23177 2173 131 25481 11077 8.8 12.2 15.3 2 1 yes
Riga 1884 1463 146 0 1609 30780 1686 0 32466 10985 13.2 9.2 12.0 1 1 yes
Shanghai 7837 1392 179 13 1584 18585 1465 71 20121 9191 9.7 12.2 17.5 2 1 yes
Beijing 7249 1254 134 9 1397 18141 595 58 18794 7362 11.0 32.1 16.5 2 1 yes
Ajaccio 7848 971 70 0 1041 13853 575 0 14428 5417 yes
Tahiti 7124 894 141 0 1035 14370 1485 0 15855 7524 4.9 8.7 9.5 2 1 yes
Metsahovi2 7806 718 103 2 823 13073 893 7 13973 5278 9.6 12.3 14.1 4 1 yes
Borowiec 7811 547 128 2 677 8521 1387 4 9912 5245 17.1 21.1 22.8 1 1 yes
Matera 7941 419 170 79 668 5913 1852 540 8305 8265 1.9 4.4 5.9 1 1 yes
Concepcion 7405 347 188 77 612 3638 1541 336 5515 6177 8.0 16.2 18.8 5 1 yes
Simeiz 1873 523 42 0 565 6083 267 0 6350 2225 0 yes
Golosiiv 1824 429 39 0 468 5365 204 0 5569 1991 60.4 84.6 72.6 4 1 yes
Grasse (LLR) 7845 134 265 399 0 2267 1898 4165 14024 7.3 20.5 0 1 yes
Koganei 7308 259 78 6 343 3407 599 26 4032 2536 8.1 13.0 27.5 1 1 yes
Katsively 1893 269 63 6 338 4052 467 26 4545 2374 0 yes
Maidanak-2 1863 159 156 14 329 1531 1415 72 3018 3769 47.4 1 no
Maidanak-1 1864 120 136 53 309 1313 1017 206 2536 3524 75.0 1 no
Potsdam 3 7841 167 49 12 228 3583 729 106 4418 2800 10.3 7.2 9.3 2 1 yes
Mendeleevo 1870 181 0 181 1666 0 0 1666 505 1 yes
Kunming 7820 76 17 2 95 975 128 10 1113 659 4 0 yes
Lviv 1831 74 20 0 94 1005 219 0 1224 743 15.0 33.6 36.3 1 1 yes
Wuhan 7231 66 17 0 83 1038 193 0 1231 714 12.6 25.0 21.8 1 yes
Komsomolsk 1868 48 10 1 59 574 66 2 642 337 no
Cagliari 7548 7 2 0 9 165 6 0 171 60 yes
Totals 70433 13750 5373 89556 1122228 143205 37413 1302846 817025

 

 

Below are the detailed descriptions of each column in Table 2:

  • Column 1 is the station location name.
  • Column 2 is the monument marker number.
  • Column 3 is the average LAGEOS normal point RMS, in millimeters, during the last quarter, based on CSR Weekly LAGEOS analysis.
  • Column 4 is the measure of short term bias stability, in millimeters, during the last quarter. The short term stability is computed as the standard deviation about the mean of the pass-by-pass range biases from the CSR Weekly LAGEOS analysis. (minimum number of passes in quarter is 10)
  • Column 5 is the measure of long term bias stability, in millimeter, during the past year. The long term stability is the standard deviation of the monthly range bias estimates from the CSR Weekly LAGEOS analysis. A station must have tracked LAGEOS (1,2) in at least 8 of the last 12 months in order to compute this metric.
  • Column 6 is the percentage of LAGEOS normal points that were accepted in CSR weekly LAGEOS analysis.
  • Column 7 is the average LAGEOS normal point RMS, in millimeters, during the last quarter, based on MCC Weekly LAGEOS analysis.
  • Column 8 is the measure of short term bias stability, in millimeters, during the last quarter. The short term stability is computed as the standard deviation about the mean of the pass-by-pass range biases from the MCC Weekly LAGEOS analysis. (minimum number of passes in quarter is 10)
  • Column 9 is the measure of long term bias stability, in millimeter, during the past year. The long term stability is the standard deviation of the monthly range bias estimates from the MCC Weekly LAGEOS analysis. A station must have tracked LAGEOS (1,2) in at least 8 of the last 12 months in order to compute this metric.
  • Column 10 is the percentage of LAGEOS normal points that were accepted in MCC weekly LAGEOS analysis.

The first entry in each table is for the performance baseline goal.

Additional Notes: Blanks in any columns implies either that there was no data or that there was insufficient data. Only stations that have supplied data within the last year are included in the table. The table is sorted in descending order by total data volume.

 

Table 2

Site Information
CSR Orbital Analysis
MCC Orbital Analysis
Column 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Location Station Number NP RMS Short Term (mm) Long Term (mm) % of good LAGEOS NP NP RMS Short Term (mm) Long Term (mm) % of good LAGEOS NP
Baseline   10.0 20.0 20.0 95.0 10.0 20.0 20.0 95.0
Yarragadee 7090 2.2 11.5 2.8 99.1 2.1 10.1 1.9 95.9
Monument Peak 7110 1.9 13.4 3.5 98.8 1.9 12.3 3.6 93.8
Graz 7839 2.0 9.7 3.3 99.1 2.1 7.0 2.7 94.2
Herstmonceux 7840 2.1 9.9 2.2 99.7 2.2 7.3 1.5 95.5
Greenbelt 7105 3.1 9.0 4.6 98.2 2.8 10.1 3.6 91.0
Changchun 7237 6.0 21.0 12.7 97.9 4.7 28.7 12.7 79.5
Riyadh 7832 2.4 17.2 4.0 97.1 2.4 11.3 3.3 92.0
Zimmerwald 7810 2.5 10.0 1.7 98.9 3.6 12.0 3.6 88.7
Hartebeesthoek 7501 1.5 14.0 4.2 98.3 1.6 15.8 2.5 95.9
Haleakala 7210 3.8 15.1 3.5 96.6 3.3 17.0 5.5 89.3
McDonald 7080 1.8 13.1 2.7 98.8 2.1 10.7 2.9 96.7
Mt. Stromlo 7849 3.0 8.5 3.2 97.1 3.8 7.5 2.7 91.0
Wettzell 8834 3.2 22.5 5.3 97.8 3.1 11.9 4.5 91.4
San Fernando 7824 2.9 19.6 16.8 64.3 2.4 14.0 13.8 91.5
Grasse 7835 2.1 15.0 4.3 99.5 2.2 13.6 3.4 94.7
Simosato 7838 6.6 31.8 12.4 95.6 4.0 29.6 11.8 79.9
Arequipa 7403 2.4 34.5 90.0
Potsdam 7836 5.0 30.7 10.4 94.2 3.1 8.3 4.2 84.6
Riga 1884 3.0 36.2 11.3 85.2     8.1  
Shanghai 7837 6.8 31.8 9.4 86.6 4.2 16.0 10.6 77.8
Beijing 7249 6.5 29.8 13.0 28.7 5.0 41.7 17.5 83.1
Tahiti 7124 2.6 15.6 2.5 94.7 2.4 16.0 3.9 90.7
Metsahovi2 7806 2.6 9.1 9.9 87.2 4.6 10.9 9.3 91.9
Borowiec 7811 5.5 23.9 19.6 90.6 3.7 16.2 82.8
Matera 7941 1.9 13.2 98.4 1.8 10.3 92.9
Concepcion 7405 2.1 23.1 9.2 93.4
Grasse (LLR) 7845 3.2 14.7 4.6 94.2 3.1 12.0 6.1 92.5
Koganei 7308 6.6 20.2 96.8 3.7 20.4 79.9
Maidanak-2 1863 7.6 18.9 18.4 100.0 5.0 15.5 34.1 81.1
Maidanak-1 1864 11.3 66.8 35.6 40.1 8.4 61.1 31.1 70.2
Potsdam 3 7841 2.7 20.0 96.4 2.4 7.7 93.8